The Principle\n\nJohn Locke's Two Treatises of Government (1689) is the foundational text of liberal political philosophy and the direct intellectual ancestor of the American Declaration of Independence. What is less widely appreciated is that Locke's natural rights theory was explicitly and extensively grounded in biblical theology - that his arguments for life, liberty, and property as natural rights rested not merely on reason but on the doctrine that human beings are God's workmanship, made in his image, and therefore not disposable by any earthly sovereign.\n\n## Biblical Foundation\n\nGenesis 1:26-28 provides Locke's starting point: 'Then God said, "Let us make mankind in our image, in our likeness, so that they may rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky"... God blessed them and said to them, "Be fruitful and increase in number; fill the earth and subdue it."' For Locke, the imago Dei (image of God) - rationally interpreted - means that human beings possess intrinsic dignity that no other human being can lawfully override. The creation mandate grounds both the right to labor and the right to the products of labor (property) in divine authorization.\n\nIn the Second Treatise, Chapter 2, Locke writes: 'For men being all the workmanship of one omnipotent and infinitely wise Maker; all the servants of one sovereign Master, sent into the world by His order and about His business; they are His property, whose workmanship they are.' Acts 17:26 - 'From one man he made all the nations, that they should inhabit the whole earth' - grounds the unity of humanity and the equal status of all persons before God and therefore before the natural law.\n\nLocke's First Treatise is a detailed, chapter-by-chapter refutation of Robert Filmer's Patriarcha (1680), which derived absolute monarchical authority from Adam's dominion over creation. Locke's counter-argument was entirely scriptural: he read the same Genesis texts as Filmer but argued that they supported no hereditary political authority whatsoever. This First Treatise represents the most extensive piece of biblical exegesis in the history of political philosophy, running to hundreds of pages of engagement with the Old Testament text.\n\n## Historical Transmission\n\nLocke published the Two Treatises anonymously in 1689, in the context of the Glorious Revolution's settlement. The biblical grounding was visible to his readers - including his direct debts to Richard Hooker's Laws of Ecclesiastical Polity, which had grounded natural law in Scripture - even as his argument also drew on classical and natural law sources.\n\nThomas Jefferson's Declaration of Independence (1776) paraphrased Locke's natural rights triad - 'life, liberty, and property' becomes 'life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness' - and Jefferson's Notes on the State of Virginia shows his awareness of Locke's biblical foundations. The Declaration's appeal to 'the laws of nature and of nature's God' and its assertion that all men 'are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights' directly translates Locke's biblically-grounded natural rights into constitutional language.\n\n## Key Champions\n\nLocke is himself the champion here, though his intellectual predecessors - including Richard Hooker, Hugo Grotius, and Samuel Pufendorf - had developed the natural law tradition on which he built. James Madison, who studied Locke at Princeton under John Witherspoon, brought Locke's biblically-grounded natural rights theory directly into the drafting of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.\n\nThe Abolitionist movement's use of Locke - particularly his argument that no person can legitimately be reduced to the status of property because persons are God's workmanship and therefore not ownable by other humans - made Locke's biblical natural rights theory the intellectual foundation for the argument that slavery was unconstitutional even before the Thirteenth Amendment.\n\n## Modern Application\n\nLocke's natural rights theory, translated through Jefferson and Madison into American constitutional law, remains the theoretical foundation of individual rights protection in the United States. The Supreme Court's substantive due process doctrine - which protects fundamental liberties from government interference even where no specific constitutional text is violated - reflects the Lockean conviction that certain rights are so foundational that no government can legitimately override them. The theological grounding of this conviction - that rights derive from God, not the state - is echoed in political discourse about 'God-given rights' that remains prevalent in American public life.\n\n## Scholarly Debate\n\nScholars debate how theologically serious Locke was about his biblical grounding. John Dunn's The Political Thought of John Locke (1969) argued that Locke's theological framework was essential, not ornamental - that his natural rights theory was incoherent without the theological premises. Jeremy Waldron's God, Locke, and Equality (2002) developed this argument comprehensively, contending that Locke's equality arguments depended on the specific Christian theological claim that all humans are made in God's image, and that secular alternatives cannot provide an equally robust foundation for universal human equality. Against this, some scholars argue that the natural law tradition Locke inhabited could generate the same conclusions without theological premises - that the biblical grounding was culturally contingent, not logically necessary. Locke's biblical natural rights theory represents the most consequential instance in history of biblical exegesis generating political philosophy that reshaped constitutional law. The American founding generation read the Two Treatises alongside Scripture and understood Locke's natural rights arguments as expressing principles that both reason and revelation confirmed. The Declaration of Independence's claim that rights are endowed by the Creator is not merely rhetorical flourish but reflects the Lockean conviction that rights grounded only in human consensus are contingent and revocable, while rights grounded in the nature of human beings as God's workmanship are inalienable. This theological grounding of constitutional rights continues to shape American political discourse in ways that purely secular constitutional theory cannot fully account for. The contemporary debate about whether natural rights require theological premises for their coherence -- whether Waldron's argument that Lockean equality depends on the image of God doctrine is correct -- has direct implications for the durability of constitutional rights in a post-Christian legal culture. Locke's biblical natural rights theory remains live in contemporary constitutional law in ways that secular liberal theory has not been able to fully replace. The persistent American discourse about 'God-given rights' -- in gun rights advocacy, in religious liberty litigation, and in pro-life argumentation -- reflects the enduring resonance of the Lockean claim that rights grounded in human dignity as God's workmanship are more secure than rights granted by political consensus. Jeremy Waldron's argument that Locke's equality claims depend on the theological premise of the imago Dei has not been successfully refuted by secular constitutional theorists, suggesting that the biblical foundation of Lockean natural rights is not merely historical accident but reflects a genuine philosophical dependence. The question of whether constitutional democracy can sustain its commitment to human dignity without the theological premises that Locke provided remains one of the most important unresolved questions in constitutional theory.
Bible References (3)
Tags
natural-rightspolitical-philosophyenglandenlightenmentconstitution