Early Access: Sign up to unlock all Pro features free through the end of 2026.
Biblexika

Bible Word Study

הוֹמָם

Hôwmâm · Homam, an Edomitish chieftain

H1950noun1 occurrences
BDB Hebrew LexiconH1950noun

הוֹמָם

Hôwmâmho-mawm'

Homam, an Edomitish chieftain

Definition

הוֹמָם (Hôwmâm) is a proper noun identifying an Edomite chieftain, specifically listed in the genealogy of the Edomites in 1 Chronicles 1:39. The name is derived from the Hebrew root meaning 'to make a noise' or 'to be tumultuous,' suggesting a connotation of commotion or uproar. In the biblical record, Homam appears only as a personal name within a genealogical list, with no additional narrative or historical details provided about his life or actions. This singular usage means the word does not carry multiple senses or meanings in different passages; its sole function is to identify this individual within the lineage of Esau (Edom).

Biblical Usage

This word is used exactly once in the Old Testament, in 1 Chronicles 1:39, within a genealogical list of the descendants of Esau and the chiefs of Edom. Its usage is purely onomastic (name-bearing) and administrative, serving to catalog the leadership of the Edomite people. There are no narrative contexts, patterns of usage, or thematic applications beyond this single, factual listing in a chronicle of ancestry.

Etymology

The name הוֹמָם (Hôwmâm) is derived from the Hebrew root הָמַם (hāmam, H2000), which means 'to make a noise,' 'to be tumultuous,' 'to destroy,' or 'to put in commotion.' It is a verbal root associated with confusion and uproar. As a proper name, it likely functioned as a descriptor or epithet, perhaps implying a character or reputation for being forceful or stirring. The KJV note compares it to הֵימָם (Hêymām, H1967), another Edomite name listed in the parallel genealogy in Genesis 36:22, which may be a variant spelling or a different individual from the same lineage.

Semantic Range

In the ancient Near Eastern cultural context, personal names were often significant and descriptive, not merely arbitrary labels. A name like Homam ('tumultuous' or 'raging') may have reflected perceived character traits, familial hopes, or commemorated an event. As an Edomite chieftain's name recorded in an Israelite genealogy (1 Chronicles 1), it also serves a cultural and political purpose: it documents the lineage and leadership of Edom (descended from Esau), Israel's brother nation and frequent rival, thereby situating Israel's own history and identity in relation to its neighbors. הֵימָם (Hêymām, H1967) — A variant or related Edomite name listed in the parallel genealogy of Genesis 36:22, possibly referring to the same individual or a close relative.

Word Details

Strong's NumberH1950
LanguageHebrew (Biblical)
Part of Speechnoun
Hebrew Formהוֹמָם
TransliterationHôwmâm
Pronunciationho-mawm'
How this works

Definitions are from the Brown-Driver-Briggs Hebrew Lexicon (BDB, 1906, public domain). Concordance and morphology data are from the OSHB (Open Scriptures Hebrew Bible).

Full methodology & sources →
Loading concordance data...
Explore “הוֹמָם” in the Lexicon
Full lexicon entry with additional scholarship, interlinear view, and commentary cross-links.

References

  1. Abbott-Smith, G. (1921) A Manual Greek Lexicon of the New Testament. Edinburgh: T&T Clark. [Public Domain]
  2. Brown, F., Driver, S.R. and Briggs, C.A. (1906) A Hebrew and English Lexicon of the Old Testament. Oxford: Clarendon Press. [Public Domain]
  3. Tyndale House, Cambridge (n.d.) Tyndale Brief lexicon of Extended Strongs for Greek (TBESG). STEPBible. Available at: https://www.stepbible.org. [CC BY 4.0]
  4. Tyndale House, Cambridge (n.d.) Translators Formatted full LSJ (TFLSJ). STEPBible. Available at: https://www.stepbible.org. [CC BY 4.0]
  5. Thayer, J.H. (1889) A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament. [Public Domain]
  6. Gesenius, W. (1846) Gesenius' Hebrew-Chaldee Lexicon to the Old Testament. [Public Domain]
  7. Dodson, J. (2010) Greek Lexicon. Biblical Humanities. [CC0]

View all sources & licensing →

See our editorial standards →